Carl Meyer <c...@dirtcircle.com> added the comment: Adding a test is easier said than done. The behavior change here depends on python being run with -S. Currently test_site skips itself if the test suite is run with -S, and if I remove that skip it crashes under -S.
Options as I see it: 1. Declare this one-liner correct by inspection. It doesn't break any existing tests. 2. Add a new test file (test_no_site.py?) that only runs with -S and tests that importing something from site doesn't trigger sys.path additions. This seems like the most reasonable test, but I'm not sure how useful it is, since I doubt most people ever try running the test suite with -S. 3. Make the fix more complicated such that it uses an intermediary variable which can be mocked (unlike sys.flags.no_site, which is read-only), and then add a test which mocks this variable, temporarily removes "site" from sys.modules, tries importing it again, and checks whether main() is called. This creates a complex test which is highly coupled to the implementation in site.py, but would be run under normal conditions (without -S). Which option do you prefer? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11591> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
