Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I suspect this may be an issue now because the old svn approach was a > full checkout for each build, whereas the hg approach is to pull to > the local clone, and then just update the build tree. So in the svn > case all the files would have a good shot at the same timestamp, > whereas with the hg approach the generated files get stale if the > contents don't change. > > I wonder if just doing a full checkout from the local clone would be > closer to the old svn behavior in general with respect to timestamps > and maybe a reasonable policy?
Ok, I've made the change on the DMG builders. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11487> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
