Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > > Nope. Your suggestion would be a new feature and those are not > > allowed in patch level releases. > > What new feature are you talking about? I think you misunderstood the > actual issue: NULL as an empty string *worked* in 3.1
And, with a very high likelihood, it also worked in 2.7, 2.6, etc. So, feel free to suggest a compatibility breakage in 3.3 if you think that's better (*), but I don't think that's acceptable in 3.2.1, where the issue should be fixed anyway. (*) which really means "provide a patch" :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11286> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
