Yang Zhang <yang.pythonb...@mailnull.com> added the comment:
After way too much time, I figured it out, after a quote from this post jumped
out at me:
See the "I/O on Pipes and FIFOs" section of pipe(7) ("man 7 pipe")
"If all file descriptors referring to the write end of a pipe have
been closed, then an attempt to read(2) from the pipe will see end-of-
file (read(2) will return 0)."
I should've known this, but it never occurred to me - had nothing to do with
Python in particular. What was happening was: the subprocesses were getting
forked with open (writer) file descriptors to each others' pipes. As long as
there are open writer file descriptors to a pipe, readers won't see EOF.
E.g.:
p1=Popen(..., stdin=PIPE, ...)
# creates a pipe the parent process can write to
p2=Popen(...)
# inherits the writer FD - as long as p2 exists, p1 won't see EOF
Turns out there's a close_fds parameter to Popen, so the solution is to pass
close_fds=True. All simple and obvious in hindsight, but still managed to cost
at least a couple eyeballs good chunks of time.
----------
resolution: -> invalid
status: open -> closed
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11226>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
