Ray.Allen <ysj....@gmail.com> added the comment: > Can you add tests for "%.s"? I would like to know if "%.s" is different than > "%s" :-)
Oh sorry~~ I made an mistake. There is no bug here. I have attached tests that show that '%.s' is the same as '%s'. Here is the updated patch: 1, changed the function name unicode_format() to 1, remove """ - "must be a sequence, not %200s", + "must be a sequence, not %.200s", """ in Python/ceval.c 2, Removing using PySequence_GetSlice() in unicode_format_align() and do a refactor to optimize the process. 3, Add tests for '%.s' and '%s', as haypo wanted. This is obviously not the final patch just convenient for other to do a review. Something more need to be discussed. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20786/issue_7330.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7330> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
