Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Hmm, ok, but AFAICT, your patch was rejected rather because of the way > it approached the problem, not so much because of the issue itself.
I would be rather for the patch myself. The bytecode currently generated for sliced indexing is awfully suboptimal. > Plus, the fact that Python 3 requires slices in more places than > Python 2 (which had the lower level getslice protocol) makes this a > bigger issue now than it was three years ago. True. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11107> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
