Bugs item #1570284, was opened at 2006-10-03 14:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1570284&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Macintosh
Group: Python 2.5
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: jjackson (jejackson)
Assigned to: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren)
Summary: Launcher reset to factory button provides bad command-line
Initial Comment:
If I push the "Reset to factory settings" in Python Launcher's Preferences
window, the command line gets a bogues "(null)" inserted, which makes a
mess of things. I don't think that was what was intended.
In trying to debug this, I notice in the source for FileSettings.m, at line
209
there are two duplicated lines:
[NSNumber numberWithBool: nosite], @"nosite",
[NSNumber numberWithBool: nosite], @"nosite",
Also, I notice at FileSettings.m:236
value = [dict objectForKey: @"nosite"];
if (value) nosite = [value boolValue];
value = [dict objectForKey: @"nosite"];
if (value) tabs = [value boolValue];
I'm wondering if these second "nosite"s should be "tabs", and if that
would fix the problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot)
Date: 2006-10-23 19:20
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1312539
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren)
Date: 2006-10-08 10:44
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=580910
Fixed in revision 52229 (trunk), 52230 (2.5 branch) and 52231/52232 (2.4
branch).
The latter checkin is a lot larger than just this fix, it is a backport of the
entire
universal binary support code from 2.5 to the official 2.4 tree (the 2.4.3.
installer was build from an out-of-tree "branch").
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren)
Date: 2006-10-06 03:26
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=580910
I'll have a look at this this weekend. On first glance the analysis for the
source
code looks correct and both lines should be changed, but I don't have time just
ow to do this and test the results just now (and then backport to the 2.5 and
2.4
trees)
P.S. I'll be doing a huge checking on the 2.4 branch this weekend, backporting
the universal python stuff to the official tree. Last week was busier than
expected, hence the late checkin.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2006-10-03 22:48
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
Ronald, I'm guessing that Jack still doesn't have time. Do
you know anything about this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1570284&group_id=5470
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
