Bugs item #1068477, was opened at 2004-11-18 01:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by akuchling
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1068477&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Python Library
>Group: Python 2.5
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Leslie (tleslie)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: linecache.py::updatecache strips directory info from files
Initial Comment:
If a filename couldn't be stat()ed, the code tries to
find it in sys.path. To do this it only takes the
filename and drops any preceding directories.
If the file happens to reside in a package, the name of
the package is lost, which can lead to badness. Eg, if
you have my_package/__init__.py, then just the file
__init__.py will be searched for, which may well be
found in the cache from a different package. This leads
to the wrong file being returned.
This bit me as a result of using pydoc on a set of my
packages. I'll try to put together a minimal example
which demonstates the behaviour.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling)
Date: 2006-08-03 17:18
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=11375
In 2.5trunk, linecache seems to be broken in a different
way; the files are never added to the cache at all, and
getlines() returns an empty list.
One problem is that, when updatecache searches through
sys.path, it does os.path.join(path, basename), not
filename, so it looks for ./__init__.py, not
./pkg1/__init__.py. Changing it to filename makes the test
script work in 2.5.
It's not clear if linecache really intends to support
multiple-component filenames, though. I think it should,
though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tim Leslie (tleslie)
Date: 2004-11-18 19:20
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1081664
I can also confirm that this bug exists in python2.4b2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tim Leslie (tleslie)
Date: 2004-11-18 18:43
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1081664
Running the attached code ( from ~/src, not ~/src/pybug) we
see that the contents of the cache are incorrect).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ tar -zxvf pybug.tar.gz
pybug/
pybug/pkg1/
pybug/pkg1/__init__.py
pybug/pkg2/
pybug/pkg2/__init__.py
pybug/bug.py
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ python pybug/bug.py
{'pkg2/__init__.py': (217L, 1051027884, ['#\n', '# The
Python Imaging Library.\n', '# $Id:
//modules/pil/PIL/__init__.py#2 $\n', '#\n', '# package
placeholder\n', '#\n', '# Copyright (c) 1999 by Secret Labs
AB.\n', '#\n', '# See the README file for information on
usage and redistribution.\n', '#\n', '\n', '# ;-)\n'],
'/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/PIL/__init__.py'),
'pkg1/__init__.py': (217L, 1051027884, ['#\n', '# The Python
Imaging Library.\n', '# $Id: //modules/pil/PIL/__init__.py#2
$\n', '#\n', '# package placeholder\n', '#\n', '# Copyright
(c) 1999 by Secret Labs AB.\n', '#\n', '# See the README
file for information on usage and redistribution.\n', '#\n',
'\n', '# ;-)\n'],
'/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/PIL/__init__.py')}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1068477&group_id=5470
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
