Bugs item #1339045, was opened at 2005-10-27 02:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1339045&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Threads Group: Python 2.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Maciek Fijalkowski (fijal) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Threading misbehavior with lambdas Initial Comment: suppose i write: def f(x): print x() for i in range(3): f ( lambda : i ) I got 0,1,2 But when I write for i in range(3): thread . start_new_thread ( f , ( lambda : i ) ) I got 2,2,2 Probably I don't get well design principles, but isn't it against thread consistency? (as long as threads does not interact with each other, interlace doesn't matter). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1339045&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com