Bugs item #763190, was opened at 2003-06-30 10:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by facundobatista You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=763190&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Threads Group: Python 2.2.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Maria Martinsdotter (dehex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Sudden death with SIGSEGV in RtlEnterCriticalSection Initial Comment: Environment: Python 2.2.2 win32all-150 Win2000 Server Dell server 2 CPU Pentuim 4 emulating 4 CPU's. Application: Service with many (50-150) threads. Problem: The entire service exits unexepectedly with only a brief reference made by Dr.Watson indicating the Windows equivalent of SIGSEGV in RtlEnterCriticalSection. Side info: Known to have happened once, we believe it may have happened three times in total but the two extra did not leave even a Dr.Watson trace. The known occurrence can be connected to our use of a timer where the action routine restarts the timer. The two extra's occurred at a point in time that connect the problem event to the timer expiration. The application have been used for five months, runnning around the clock. The customer installation currently use five instances of the base software, only configuration differs. It is arbitrary which instance fail. We have no means to trigger the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Facundo Batista (facundobatista) Date: 2005-05-30 15:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=752496 Deprecated. Reopen only if still happens in 2.3 or newer. . Facundo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Facundo Batista (facundobatista) Date: 2005-01-15 16:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=752496 Please, could you verify if this problem persists in Python 2.3.4 or 2.4? If yes, in which version? Can you provide a test case? If the problem is solved, from which version? Note that if you fail to answer in one month, I'll close this bug as "Won't fix". Thank you! . Facundo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Maria Martinsdotter (dehex) Date: 2003-06-30 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=807857 Apart from what we initially reported, no extensions are used. It is all pure Python and the only part of win32all used is the support for running it as a service. We are aware of the enhancements provided by 2.3 beta but let it suffice to say that the customer is picky. We have not been able to reproduce the problem in our test environment, however the hardware is not as sophisticated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) Date: 2003-06-30 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=33168 Are there any other C/Extension modules used which are not from the standard python distribution? Can you make a self contained test case? I encourage you to test with 2.3 beta 2. There were some thread changes which could affect this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=763190&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
