On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 01:01:43 PM Kenneth Miller wrote: > ping. :) > > > ________________________________ > From: Kenneth Miller <kennethadammil...@yahoo.com> > To: "pyqt@riverbankcomputing.com" <pyqt@riverbankcomputing.com> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 5:25 PM > Subject: Using SWIG to wrap application written in QT > > > > So I have this application that I'm writing that uses the Qt libraries. I > want to wrap the my application and all of it's objects so that I can call > it from a scripting language quickly, be it python, or ocaml or whatever. > Anyway, for the last bit I've been trying to get a module compiled that > will allow me to dynamically call into the classes & functions that I've > defined. SWIG seems to work right, and recently I even got my own self > defined class within a module from my C++ source to run, although it > segfaulted and I have yet to find out exactly why. > > > > Can this be done? I mean, I was wondering it would be more appropriate that > I use SIP. One of the problems that I'm facing (I think) is that some > arguments to my classes and functions are Qt objects. But I can't export > those functions in my SWIG module without also writing a wrapper to the Qt > objects manually (is that right?). I'm very new to SWIG, but I definitely > need the speed of a scripting language for my development, because the > compile cycle with Qt and C++ is slow. In addition, I'm kind of > considering SIP in parallel, so I need advice as to which is more > appropriate. > > Can anybody advise me what the best route is in order to get what I want? > SIP or SWIG?
You'll definitely want to use sip. PyQt sources(check the sip dir) themselves are a good reference on how to do things. Matt _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
