On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Phil Thompson <p...@riverbankcomputing.com> wrote: > Good point. Maybe it would be more explicit to call it pyqt5 rather than > qt5 (to avoid confusion with the PyQt4 built on Qt5 case)?
I'm fine with that (though it seems to me that the module from PyQt4 compiled against Qt5 will be compatible with PyQt5's module). -- Dmitry Shachnev _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
