On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 19:04:38 -0500, William Kyngesburye <wokl...@kyngchaos.com> wrote: > On Apr 2, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Phil Thompson wrote: > >> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:28:54 -0500, William Kyngesburye >> <wokl...@kyngchaos.com> wrote: >>> A bit of a discrepancy in API locations: >>> >>> In the Qscintilla source, the default location to place the API files is >>> QT_INSTALL_DATA/qsci, for both the Qscintilla library compilation and >> the >>> Qsci PyQt module compilation. >>> >>> In the PyQt source, the default location for the API files is QTDIR/qsci >>> (that's what "configure.py --help" tells me). >>> >>> On OS X, at least, QT_INSTALL_DATA is defined in qmake, QTDIR is not >> (and >>> it's not something most OS X users will think to define in the shell, if >>> they even know what the QTDIR should be because the OS X Qt installation >> is >>> weird), so PyQt API files could end up at the root /qsci, unless it's >>> configured with the -n flag to set the location. >>> >>> If QTDIR is something like an install prefix, QTDIR/qsci is probably not >>> right on other systems with a defined QTDIR anyways. >> >> QTDIR is shorthand for the root of your Qt installation - it's not an >> environment variable. >> >> Suggestions welcome for a clearer way of expressing this. >> > So, the problem still stands - QTDIR/qsci is not the proper default place > to put the Qsci API files - it doesn't agree with the default used in > Qscintilla itself.
In a standard Qt installation these resolve to the same directory. The different ways of referring to it reflect the different ways that the scripts determine it. Phil _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
