Okay, now I got two private mails, which I think should've gone to the list :) Otherwise, I might even get more, and nobody else would know whereabout the discussion was heading. And it was about discussion, not only about personal enlightenment, although that was a main point for me. A quite good response was from John Archie, who sent me a link I'll bounce here to the list:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html It poses some compelling arguments, but you should've pressed 'reply-to-all' ;) Thanks anyway. Cheers, Tsjerk On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar <tsje...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Justin, > >> I can change it, but there are some good reasons for leaving it as is. > > Can you expand on that? > > Cheers, > > Tsjerk > > > -- > Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D. > > Computational Chemist > Medicinal Chemist > Neuropharmacologist > -- Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D. Computational Chemist Medicinal Chemist Neuropharmacologist ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net) Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
