On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:26:48AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:00:44PM -0500, Michael George Lerner wrote: > > I've gotten the code much closer to working. Also, I think it's factored > > well enough that most of it should be non-GPL-contaminated. After I > > actually get it working completely, I'll email the APBS folks to see if > > they care about licensing issues. > > What's the problem? Both PyMOL and APBS are licensed under the GPL so I > see no problems there.
Well, pymol isn't obviously. Note to self: Don't post about licensing stuff after an evening of mulled wine. Still, as long as the pymol license is GPL-compatible (which I believe it is, but I'm no lawyer), and the additional code is licensed under the same license, it should be alright, as I understand it. sorry, Michael
