+0 (user)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 14:43
> To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.1.1
> 
> 
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, David Allouche wrote:
> 
> > Thank you, that was very informative.
> >
> > +0 for this release, I builds and pass my test suite.
> >
> > But I was unable to make a complete integration test because I do not
> > have a proper index format migration infrastructure and my index is
> > made of incompletely-upgraded lucene6 and lucene7 segments.
> 
> So far, you're the only one who has cast a vote.
> No one else, no PMC member, none of the longtime users, no one.
> 
> Besides the Apache procedural aspect, voting is also a gauge of interest
in a
> project. If there is no user interest in the PyLucene project anymore
maybe
> it's time to stop making releases for a while ?
> 
> PyLucene is a bit special in that it doesn't involve many people for
> development since it is machine-generated by JCC and JCC has been stable
> for a while. In that sense, it is important that actual users of PyLucene
make
> themselves known by voting, not much else goes on on the project's mailing
> list or in the source code.
> 
> If there are actual users showing interest by voting here, I feel more
> confortable then in nagging people on the Lucene PMC for their procedural
> vote.
> 
> Andi..
> 
> >
> > I will post my questions about index upgrading on
> > java-u...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:java-u...@lucene.apache.org>.
> 
> 
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >> On 11 Jun 2019, at 16:50, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jun 11, 2019, at 06:30, David Allouche <da...@allouche.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This is maybe a silly question, but what is the purpose of this voting
> process?
> >>
> >> By the rules of Apache, three PMC binding votes are needed to make a
> release. In addition, it's a gauge of general interest in the project.
> >>
> >>> Is this something required by the project governance?
> >>
> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >> (see "votes on package releases", in particular)
> >>
> >>> What is the meaning of a vote? Does that mean "I am interested", or
> does it mean "I have tested the latest trunk and it looks good", or
something
> else?
> >>
> >> If you find a bug in the release artifacts (not in the latest trunk)
before the
> release is made, the release is likely to be pulled.
> >>
> >>> What is the typical expected delay for reply? For example, I reserve
> Fridays for technical debt management (including upgrading dependencies),
> so I cannot typically validate a new PyLucene version in less than a week.
> >>
> >> A vote must run for at least 72 hours.
> >> Because you are not on the PMC, your vote falls into the "interest
> gauging" category, is not binding and is considered "best effort".
> >>
> >>> This is probably all common questions with well documented answers. If
> that's the case, then it would be nice to have a link to the answers in
VOTE
> requests.
> >>
> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> Andi..
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> On 11 Jun 2019, at 00:39, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The PyLucene 8.1.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of
> >>>> Apache Lucene 8.1.1 is ready.
> >>>>
> >>>> A release candidate is available from:
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.1.1-rc1/
> >>>>
> >>>> PyLucene 8.1.1 is built with JCC 3.5, included in these release
artifacts.
> >>>>
> >>>> JCC 3.5 supports Python 3.3+ (in addition to Python 2.3+).
> >>>> PyLucene may be built with Python 2 or Python 3.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 8.1.1.
> >>>> Anyone interested in this release can and should vote !
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks !
> >>>>
> >>>> Andi..
> >>>>
> >>>> ps: the KEYS file for PyLucene release signing is at:
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lucene/pylucene/KEYS
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/KEYS
> >>>>
> >>>> pps: here is my +1
> >>>
> >
> >

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to