[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16819386#comment-16819386
]
Andi Vajda edited comment on PYLUCENE-47 at 4/16/19 10:20 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I took a look at your patch and it makes sense (thanks!)
Would it make sense to include the return type of the method in the rang
calculation ?
Would it make sense to then continue sorting, as a third criteria, on the rang
of interfaces each parameter and return type class implements ?
Andi..
was (Author: vajda):
I took at your patch and it makes sense (thanks!)
Would it make sense to include the return type of the method in the rang
calculation ?
Would it make sense to then continue sorting, as a third criteria, on the rang
of interfaces each parameter and return type class implements ?
Andi..
> Type matching in methods with same number of arguments
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PYLUCENE-47
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-47
> Project: PyLucene
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Petrus Hyvönen
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: java-example-test-parameters-v2.2.zip,
> java-example-test-parameters.zip, pylucene-47-2.patch, pylucene-47-3.patch
>
>
> If the same number of arguments are used in a method and the arguments are
> positively matched also on subclasses of the argument. The order of testing
> in the generated code will matter and give unpredictable results.
> A test case is attached below. It should fail in most cases but with a piece
> of luck the order of tests in the generated code may get right and it will
> work (1/24 chance if at random).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
