Would it make more sense to move to py4j like spark uses. JCC is awesome tech but installing it is a pain
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, at 09:35 AM, Alexander Yaworsky wrote: > Well, this bothered me (not a dev but fixed some of your bugs locally > long long ago, why didn't send patches is another story). Here's my > opinion, as a user. 1. Be in sync with lucene is a must. 2. Be in sync > with python is a must. Therefore, > > > Question: What should happen to PyLucene now? > > > > [ ] I’m happy with the last 4.x release, no need for new releases > > [ ] Please, a new 6.x release (but I can’t contribute) > > [ ] I’ll help make a new release happen, if I get some help! > > [X] Only care about the JCC part > > [X] Close down the sub project -- IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN > > [ ] Don’t care. I’m no longer a user > > [X] Other: Move JCC to P3 > > Actually, the brilliant part of this project is JCC. In a company I > work for we still use it to utilize Java libraries from python. This > is the fastest solution and this sub-project must exist separately > imo. We do not use Lucene since 00's btw. > > Thanks. > > Alexander.
