Hi, Just want to jump in and state my interest in the JCC part of it. I'm not using pylucene but using another library wrapped with JCC, which is working well.
My coding skills are not really there to help much out, but for what it is worth I can at least state my appreciation for this project, which is to a very large degree (totally in last years?) Andi's work. I have not been responding in the voting for releases since i'm neither a user of pylucene or part of any organized group. As mentioned earlier, JCC for python 3 would be high on my wishlist. :) Regards On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Nov 15, 2015, at 22:54, Jeff Breidenbach <j...@jab.org> wrote: > > > > I don't understand this. Lucene is the dominant open source > > search software, and Python continues to gain popularity. > > Why is there a decline in interest? > > Dunno. The PMC lives in Java land and doesn't pay much attention. And I > stopped nagging them. As for users, there are plenty of them (?) but they > don't participate or otherwise show interest by voting for releases. > > Andi.. -- _____________________________________________ Petrus Hyvönen, Uppsala, Sweden Mobile Phone/SMS:+46 73 803 19 00
