I figured this is not complete for jira, retrying /w email... r
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote: > I think that the apache mail server is eating up the attachment. Try to make > it a .diff file or attach the patch to a jira issue. Thanks ! > > Andi.. > > On Jul 6, 2012, at 18:54, Roman Chyla <roman.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Attaching the patch (there is no chance I could do it in one go, but >> if parts are committed in the trunk, then we can do more...I have also >> introduced base class for unittests, so that may be st to wave) >> >> So far, found one serious problem, crashes VM -- see. eg >> test/test_BinaryDocument.py - when getting the document using: >> reader.document(0) >> >> >> What works fine now: >> >> test/ >> test_Analyzers >> test_Binary >> test_RegexQuery >> >> samples/LuceneInAction/ >> index.py >> BasicSearchingTest.py >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Roman Chyla <roman.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The patch probably probably didn't make it to the list, I'll file a ticket >>> later >>> >>> It is definitely lot of work with the python code, I have gone through >>> 1.5 test cases now, and it is just 'unpleasant', so many API changes >>> out there - but I'll try to convert more >>> >>> roman >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jul 6, 2012, at 0:27, Roman Chyla <roman.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Lucene is 4.0 in alpha release and we would like to start working with >>>>> pylucene4.0 already. I checked out the pylucene trunk and made the >>>>> necessary changes so that it compiles. Would it be possible to >>>>> incorporate (some of) these changes? >>>> >>>> Absolutely, please send a patch to the list or file a bug and attach it >>>> there. >>>> >>>> The issue with a PyLucene 4.0 release is not so much getting it to compile >>>> and run but rewriting all the tests and samples (originally ported from >>>> Java) since the Lucene api changed in many ways. That's a large amount of >>>> work and some of the new analyzer/tokenizer framework stuff needs some new >>>> jcc support for generating classes on the fly. I've got that written to >>>> some extent already but porting the samples and tests again is daunting. >>>> >>>> Andi.. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Roman
