-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Andi Vajda [mailto:va...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 30. April 2012 19:32
An: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: PyLucene use JCC shared object by default
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Thomas Koch wrote:
Dear Andi, I again had a look at the patch I submitted recently and
would like to get back to it. An updated version of the patch is
attached to this email - the patch is against the branch_3x repo
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/pylucene/branches/branch_3x
Oh, and there is no attachment in your email. Maybe it got eaten up by some
mail server. Please, make sure it's of a text mimetype or mail it to me
directly.
Thanks !
Andi..
The patch mainly
- adds two java classes: PythonList, PythonListIterator
- adds according Python classes (JavaListIterator and JavaList in
collections.py)
Purpose:
- provide a Java-based List implementation in JCC/PyLucene (similar to
existing PythonSet/JavaSet)
- allow to pass python lists via Java Collections into PyLucene
Let's try summarize shortly: PythonSet /JavaSet was already existing, but
nothing similar for Lists. I made an implementation of PythonList /JavaList
and with your help this is now basically working. Except of an open issue that
affects both JavaSet and JavaList: initialization of an ArrayList with a JavaSet
(or JavaList) may cause trouble.
As you said: "There is a bug somewhere with constructing an ArrayList from
a python collection like JavaSet or JavaList."
I tried to change the toArray() method as you suggested, but that didn't
help. As far as I understood, there are two options to box python values into
a typed JArray:
1) use the object based JArray class and box python values by wrapping
them with the corresponding Java object (e.g. type<int> -> lucene.Integer):
x =
lucene.JArray('object')([lucene.Boolean(True),lucene.Boolean(False)
])
JArray<object>[<Object: true>, <Object: false>]
type(x[0])
<type 'Object'>
2) use the correct array type (int, float, etc.) and pass the list of Python
elements or literals) to the JArray constructur, e.g.
y = lucene.JArray('bool')([True,False])
JArray<bool>[True, False]
type(y[0])
<type 'bool'>
I tried both of them (see _pyList2JArray methods in collections.py) but
none of them did the trick. Actually the 'empty objects in ArrayList' problem
remains when handling with strings (the ArrayList object that is initialized
with a JavaSet or JavaList of string items will have a number of objects as the
original JavaSet/JavaList, but all objects are the same - ooks like an array of
empty objects). Furthermore another issue with integer lists comes into play:
here the initialization of ArrayList with the Collection fails with a Java
stacktrace (lucene.JavaError: org.apache.jcc.PythonException).
The most simple test case is as follows:
--%< --
import lucene
lucene.initVM()
from lucene.collections import JavaList
# using strings: the ArrayList is created, but initialized with empty
objects jl = JavaList(['a','b']) al = lucene.ArrayList(jl) assert (not
al.get(0).equals(al.get(1))), "unique values"
# using ints: the ArrayList is not created, but an error occurs instead:
# Java stacktrace: org.apache.jcc.PythonException: ('while calling
toArray') jl = JavaList(range(3)) al = lucene.ArrayList(jl) --%< --
I currently feel like having to stab around in the dark to find out
what's going on here and would welcome any suggestions. Needs some
JCC
expert I guess ,-)
Of course we can leave the patch out - but still there's the same issue with
JavaSet.
kind regards
Thomas
--
OrbiTeam Software GmbH & Co. KG, Germany http://www.orbiteam.de
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Andi Vajda [mailto:va...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. April 2012 20:37
An: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: PyLucene use JCC shared object by default
Hi Thomas,
...
Lucene 3.6 just got released a few days ago. Apart from your patch, the
PyLucene 3.6 release is ready. I'm about to go offline (email only) for a
week.
Let's revisit this patch then (first week of May). It's not blocking the
release
right now as, even if I sent out a release candidate for a vote, the three
business days required for this would take this into the time I'm away.
...
Andi..