On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:29, Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> wrote:
Am 27.09.2010 03:59, schrieb Andi Vajda:
In 3.x and trunk, I've been porting ICU-dependant Lucene contrib
features to
use PyICU [1][2] (which depends on C++ ICU). I think that having
PyLucene
depend both on C++ ICU and Java ICU is one ICU too many :-), though.
I'm not sure at this point which should remain. There are
advantages to
both... I'm open to arguments in favor of either. You can see
examples in
the 3.x tree [3].
When can we expect a new release of PyLucene with ICU support?
Once Lucene Java releases 3.1 and we decide here which ICU we want to
use. I'm leaning towards C++ ICU with PyICU but I'm biased. Does the
ICU stuff you see now on the PyLucene 3.x branch work well for you ?
As far as I know PyLucene releases are tight to Lucene releases.
What's
the release schedule for Lucene 3.1?
There recently was talk of a 3.1 release on the java-dev list and how
to release much more frequently. The discussion then got a bit stuck
on maven support and the date for the next release didn't come up. You
might want to ping java-...@lucene.apache.org. A lot of good stuff has
happened on the 3.x branch and a 3.1 release would be welcome.
Andi..
My Google foo isn't strong enough
to find a road map or time table for upcoming releases.
Christian
