Re: a few issues with 2.4.1 RC3

[Andi Vajda]

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Andi Vajda wrote:
If, however, you replace the field.setValue('abc') call in the Python code 
with passing 'abc' to the constructor, it works too.
It looks like you found a bug with the setValue() wrapper.

I'm looking into it...

It also works if one calls field.setValue(u'abc') instead of 
field.setValue('abc'). Clearly, a bug.

Andi..