On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> wrote:
> this looks pretty great. have you spoken with the maintainers of uwsgi / > gunicorn / etc about plaster support yet? > Thanks - I have not. I imagine they would depend on plaster instead of pastedeploy and then advise people to install the appropriate binding for whatever wsgi config format they are using... Such as plaster_pastedeploy to keep things working as they were before. Some other tools that might benefit from plaster support would be alembic - at least in my own workflow. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/CAKdhhwGtgWUY6LoXs2hAJbv1Q-VwLSUn8-ziw%2BAkTCZgbJ92PA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
