On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 5:54:57 PM UTC-5, Jeff Dairiki wrote: > > > If there's real interest in it, I can look into splitting it into it's own > library. >
I'd be interested in seeing it. I don't know if we'd be able to use it, as we need to force some things to be stored server side (even if a session is encrypted, there is still a bag of worms called "compliance" that I do not want to touch) I've got a new version of our `pyramid_session_redis` testing on staging right now. if it works, I'll try a production release and go to pypi. I'm not happy with the code/design because I tried to maintain compatibility (then decided to break it), but the features work as needed and a few dozen new tests pass. I modeled a lot of stuff after dogpile (the payload tracks an api version, a class instance is used to track null ids) and tracked a timestamp into the payload so updating the timeout can be deferred until a threshold is reached. The redis traffic on our staging server is already a lot lower. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylons-discuss/a6acb8bf-c82b-43db-990d-a08f71ea1d5e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
