Has anyone used traversal over a filesystem for non-static content?
I'm thinking of putting my HTML content in files to get Git versioning
and text-editor friendliness, so that each file would represent a URL
but not be served as-is (you'd still put a site template around it and
plug in metadata). Interspersed there would be true static files
(e.g., images), although I'd like to have dynamic thumbnails. This
suggests a traversal structure with objects for directories and
different file types, like Kotti but with the nodes in the filesystem
rather than in a database. (Without through-the-web editing.)

My primary issue is how to structure the files. In the past I've used
email-message format, with the metadata in headers and the HTML body
in the content, and a script that applies a template to generate a
static HTML page. That's OK for editing, although if you view the raw
file in a browser it formats all the metadata into a paragraph.
Another approach I'm considering is to put the metadata in a TOML file
per directory. That would allow for expansion and automatically parse
data types, and be more human-readable than JSON, but it would
separate the metadata from the content. Has anyone done anything
similar?

Also, have people used the Python thumbnail-management libraries? Is
there a lightweight one you'd recommend? My past practice is to
pregenerate the thumbnails as static files next to the originals, but
I want to get away from that.

-- 
Mike Orr <[email protected]>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to