On Nov 8, 2010, at 10:47 AM, miniwark wrote: > Yes after reading a while here and here, this is not realy what i was > seeking. > Apparently "extendable" mostly mean hackable wihout forking. It not > seems to > correspond to plugining or decomposing an application. Il will follow > your advice > and look further to htne entry points and registry dics mecanisms.
Generally, *extensible* as in a plugin app, requires a large set of assumptions. If you're composing and plugging in your own apps, then this "Extensible" does apply for you, because you can make assumptions like "my apps all use SQLAlchemy, they all put their init_model here", etc. It takes a set of those assumptions about the datastore, the templating, etc. to make re-usable 'apps'. Cheers, Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
