First point, xml not required.

Second point - http://docs.pylonshq.com/pyramid/dev/designdefense.html

Conclusion, don't dismiss technologies just because brands (ie repoze)
associated with it.

- Rocky

On Nov 7, 12:00 am, Ev Kontsevoy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Pyramid brings a strong "java odor" in the form of XML-based config.
> Why? Put views in views directory, models go to models and handlers to
> handlers. Why infect our world with XML? And even if someone needs to
> be verbose - use Python for it, its nicer! XML has no place in the
> world of dynamic languages, its not "declarative" vs "imperative",
> it's "dumb" vs "normal".
>
> Not loving Pyramid at all. It's not bad, but it needed to be AMAZING
> to justify killing Pylons. Sorry to say this, but Pyramid is not it.
>
> Look, people had reasons to pick Pylons over Repoze. We don't like
> anything Zope, we don't like Repoze and we certainly can't stand XML.
> Now you've renamed Repoze to Pyramid and offering us to upgrade or
> shut up.
>
> Please, please please: stay away from Repoze guys. :-) They're bad
> influence. Don't pick up the phone when they call. You have a much
> nicer framework (Pylons). You have users who love you. Don't push us
> away!!! :)
>
> Cheers,
> ev
>
> On Nov 6, 2:30 pm, Ben Bangert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Some people have been concerned lately regarding the status of the Pylons
> > framework in light of new effort being spent around additions to Pyramid. I
> > thought it'd be useful to help assuage those fears, and explain a bit more
> > about the Pylons code-base.
>
> > Pylons 1.0 was released 6 months ago, in May of 2010. Between 1.0 and 0.9.7,
> > which were released over a year earlier in Feb. of 2009, there were almost 
> > no
> > changes to Pylons besides deprecated bits being removed, and a few defaults
> > changing. Most new features instead came from changes to Beaker, SQLAlchemy,
> > WebHelpers, and occasionally Routes.
>
> > Beaker, SQLAlchemy, Mako, and WebHelpers are unaffected by Pyramid: they
> > continue to work as they have. Pyramid can use most of these packages just
> > like the Pylons framework can. (A few webhelpers are currently incompatible
> > with Pyramid: see pylons-devel). As these packages are also where most of 
> > the
> > feature improvements for Pylons framework users came from, again, there's no
> > change in that!
>
> > Nothing is changing regarding the Pylons 1.x code-base from how it has been
> > for the past year and a half. It is a mature and stable code-base that meets
> > many people's needs. There's no reason to feel bummed or sad that it is
> > somehow 'dead' or 'end-of-life'. It will continue to receive the same bug
> > fixes and security fixes that it has been getting for the past 18 months, in
> > perpetuity.
>
> > Pyramid really only affects where myself and some other Pylons developers 
> > will
> > be spending our future development efforts. As a stable and mature 
> > code-base,
> > the Pylons framework has required a lot less of my attention lately, so my
> > current development time spent on it has already dropped quite low. The
> > development time I spend on the Pylons framework is not changing. With that
> > freed up time -- and additional developers through this merger -- we can 
> > spend
> > more effort and resources pushing ahead with Pyramid-related development. 
> > One
> > thing we're doing is increasing our scope to tackle larger problems that 
> > were
> > beyond the scope of the Pylons framework.
>
> > The existing amount of time I've been spending on the Pylons code-base for 
> > the
> > past 6+ months is not changing. The Pylons 1.x code-base is not changing, 
> > apps
> > using it will continue to run. But with a larger development effort, we'll 
> > be
> > able to build some useful additions that should help people whose needs
> > haven't been completely met by the Pylons framework.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Ben

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to