The below is from running MTR for windows.

I am starting to think this is problem is intermittent.

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      WinMTR
statistics                                   |

|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg
| Wrst | Last |

|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|

|                             192.168.0.1 -    0 |  394 |  394 |    0 |    0
|   16 |    0 |

|                           99.28.211.254 -   37 |  394 |  252 |    0 |    9
|   31 |   16 |

|       dist2-vlan60.stl2mo.sbcglobal.net -   42 |  394 |  231 |    0 |    9
|   16 |   16 |

|           bb2-g0-0.stl2mo.sbcglobal.net -   41 |  394 |  234 |    0 |   14
|  188 |   15 |

|                          151.164.99.189 -   46 |  394 |  216 |   15 |   34
|  234 |   15 |

|    te7-2.ccr02.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com -   48 |  393 |  206 |   15 |   21
|  203 |   16 |

|te0-2-0-1.ccr22.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com -   44 |  393 |  224 |   15 |   16
|   32 |   31 |

|te0-0-0-6.ccr22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com -   41 |  393 |  232 |   31 |   31
|   47 |   31 |

|    te4-4.mpd02.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com -   58 |  393 |  167 |   31 |   36
|  188 |   31 |

|                            38.117.92.82 -   47 |  393 |  209 |   31 |   57
|  844 |   31 |

|                   69-10-224-202.onx.com -   50 |  393 |  198 |   31 |   32
|   47 |   31 |

|                   69-10-224-220.onx.com -   52 |  393 |  192 |   31 |   32
|   47 |   31 |

|          74-213-166-67.ultrahosting.com -   44 |  393 |  221 |   31 |   32
|  141 |   31 |

|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
   WinMTR - 0.8. Copyleft @2000-2002 Vasile Laurentiu Stanimir  (
[email protected] )
Still frustrated.

Cheers,
Gazza
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Ross Vandegrift <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:16:42PM -0700, cd34 wrote:
> > I did a quick run of ab, several requests came in at 3.1 seconds.  I
> > don't know what sort of network they are running, but 3 seconds seems
> > very similar to an arp table rebuild in certain switches.  When enough
> > machines are put on a network, it overflows the 8192 record tcam (or
> > whatever the limit is on that switch), which causes it to need to
> > rebuild the arp tree as it rediscovers.  Until each machine is
> > rediscovered, they are basically 'off-net'.
>
> Such ARP table exhaustion would typically be steady-state in a
> datacenter environment - a complete and total meltdown, never
> recoverging.  3 seconds wouldn't be nearly enough time for such a
> thing to wring out.  Also, TCAM isn't used for ARP entries - lots of
> things are stored in TCAM, but ARP isn't one of them.
>
> > I'd file a trouble ticket with them and let them know that you are
> > seeing packet loss into their network and that you are seeing timeouts
> > on requests going to your server and see what they say.  I don't think
> > your issue is software related - I agree that it looks like it is
> > network related.
>
> If you opt to contact their support department, provide a traceroute
> from your problamtic location to the destination that shows either
> failing traceroutes or extended delays at the LAST HOP (the
> intermediate hops don't matter).  MTR is a nice program for generating
> nice reports of this, but some NOCs want classic traceroute output.
>
> I don't see any evidence of a network issue, unless you were able to
> measure the 6% packet loss only at the time of HTTP impact.  I'm not
> seeing any packet loss to 74.213.166.67 from my location, but it
> appears that the HTTP service is stopped now.
>
> Are you hosting on a virtualized platform?  I'd be suspicious of
> platform performance issues.
>
> Ross
>
> --
> Ross Vandegrift
> [email protected]
>
> "If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter.  If the going gets tough,
> the songs get tougher."
>        --Woody Guthrie
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkweWlQACgkQMlMoONfO+HDgugCfWATMenhPQbC+v/F8c6yG5I+P
> NL4AnA7ZlXJy4kQpolujpZawMxzhskXD
> =1keh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to