I had not seen schematics before. The information on the pypi page does look promising. And active is good. The only reason you might consider limone at this point, I would think, is if you want to continue using your Colander schemas instead of writing new schematics models. Conversion is probably not too hard, though.
Chris On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Guillaume Gauvrit <ggauv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > thanks for your answer. > > I use Colander for a rest api (using Cornice) but this time > I d'like to consume that API and I will prefer to manipulate objects > instead of dict and simple types. > > I will take a look at schematics which looks like limone and may > be more alive. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
