On 06/02/2011 10:09 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Wichert Akkerman<wich...@wiggy.net> wrote:
Personally I find that this coding style makes it hard to read code: you are
basically rewriting a standard language feature (raising an exception) in a
way that makes it look like a normal function call.
That's only in the difference between "abort()" and "raise abort()".
As I've said, I'm not opposed to requiring the latter, and I think it
might actually be a good thing.
I have no objections to 'raise abort()'; that would make abort a simple
http exception factory.
Wichert.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
