On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:43 +0000, Graham Higgins wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 15 Dec 2010, at 17:13, Chris McDonough wrote: > > I'm considering making a fairly major terminology change to the > > Pyramid > > docs. I'd like to consider renaming the term "model" to "resource" in > > the docs. > > > Does anyone strongly agree or strongly disagree with this? > > > Kinda "strongly disagree" because it could later lead to even greater > confusion. The entire semantics of the term "resource" as used in a > net context is currently in flux: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_(Web) > > OTOH, maybe your description could bring some much-needed clarity to > the area.
For those folks that strongly disagree, given that some distinction needs to be made between "domain model" and "graph of traversable objects", can you think of a better term than "resource" for a node in that graph? - C -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
