On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Ben Bangert <b...@groovie.org> wrote: > On Sep 13, 11:49 am, Mike Orr <sluggos...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can it be made into a request method so you don't have to pass the >> request object? That would be more OO. > > Yea, maybe request.link? request.url would conflict with the webob url > property.
It's a good enough name for now. It does connote an entire <a> rather than just the URL (cf. webhelpers.html.tags.link_to()). But I can't think of a better name. > >> Or do you have to paste the markup text from the subprojects and >> convert all "autoclass" to "class" by hand? The problem with this is >> it would gradually drift out of date unless you went through every few >> months looking for differences between your docs and the originals, >> which would take a lot of time. > > Yea, we're going to have to compose copy/paste to an extent, from the > other docs. Well, hopefully '.. autoclass' will work if the package is installed. WebHelpers and other packages uses '.. autoclass' extensively. It's one thing to copy ReST documentation from another package. It's another thing to reconstruct the ReST from the HTML or paste it directly from the docstrings. which is what you'd have to do if autoclass doesn't work. -- Mike Orr <sluggos...@gmail.com> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
