There is a comparison [1] of eight different asynchronous networking frameworks in Python. Tornado and Gevent [2] have the better performance.
[1] http://nichol.as/asynchronous-servers-in-python [2] http://gevent.org/ On 13 ene, 20:36, "jgard...@jonathangardner.net" <jgard...@jonathangardner.net> wrote: > What about Python greenlets to handle concurrency? > > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/greenlet > > Basically, it's Stackless in CPython as a module import. > > On Dec 16 2009, 4:10 pm, Joan Miller <pelok...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've to starting to play with Go to manage the concurrency and it's > > awesome. > > > On 16 dic, 23:51, Damjan <gdam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > One other issue is that the thread overhead is not usually the > > > > bottleneck in a WSGI application. Database access has a much bigger > > > > impact on performance. If you need to handle thousands of > > > > simultaneous requests, you probably need multiple servers anyway. > > > > depends, > > > if you need to handle thousands of requests that are at the same time > > > pretty idle (see Comet for ex), the memory that threads consume is a > > > big issue. > > > > An event based framework solves this by saving as litle state as > > > needed (or possible) so that it could handle a large number of > > > otherwise slow or idle connections. > > > > Python in general is not so well suited for all of this. I've been > > > playing with Erlang latelly and this kind of stuff is impresivelly > > > easier there. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-de...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
