Oh that's interesting.

My apologies for jumping the gun. (like I said, I'm not really a
security person)

On May 4, 11:49 pm, Ben Bangert <b...@groovie.org> wrote:
> On May 4, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Mike Lewis wrote:
>
> > Having passwords encrypted in MD5 sent in plaintext is probably almost
> > worse than just sending them in plaintext.
>
> I was about to say something similar, until I read more about Paul's  
> scheme. :)
>
> Paul is using a hand-shake method whereby the password MD5 is only  
> transmitted when the user first creates their account, *or* when they  
> change their password. Other than that, the password *nor* the MD5 of  
> the password is every transmitted at all. Instead the system relies on  
> the client processing information, I believe this is an accurate  
> summary:
>
> * Server knows MD5
> * Client will know MD5 once it hashs the users password on the client-
> side
>
> Server includes in the form, a hidden field containing a timestamp,  
> for use with their password, so client-side Javascript will return as  
> the password value:
> MD5(timestamp + MD5(password))
>
> Since the server knows the MD5(password) as well, it then does the  
> same calculation, and see if they have the same value. If not, it can  
> generate a new timestamp to ask for on the next request.
>
> Obviously, given the weakness of MD5, SHA-1 should be used (or even  
> SHA-256). But other than that, this really does seem *waaaaaay* better  
> than transmitting passwords in the clear every single time a user logs  
> in. This way the crypted password is only sent in the clear for new  
> account creation, and password changing (and even then, only the  
> crypted form *never* the clear-text).
>
> For better security, the server should also provide a random salt for  
> the original creation as well, such that a plan SHA/MD5 version of  
> *just* the password will never be sent.
>
> Once the scheme is updated to SHA-1 or SHA-256, I think it'd be a  
> great alternative to sending passwords in the clear over non-SSL as  
> Paul suggests.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
>  smime.p7s
> 3KViewDownload
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to