On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Wojciech Malinowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Orr wrote: >> Nobody has followed up with suggestions for a better API spec. Should >> I ask again for volunteers, leave the ticket open, or just close it? >> My concern is this is too implementation-specific an issue to come up >> with an API that would work for a wide variety of users, which is our >> threshold for helper acceptance. > > In the attached file you can find my proposal for the function name, > spec and implementation. > > What do you think about it? Feel free to modify if anyone has an idea of > how to improve it. > that's seems really good, +1
> Regards, > Wojciech Malinowski > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
