>>> I'm not wild about the name .static for generation-only routes, but I can't >>> think of a better one. >>> .genonly is confusing, and .nomatch may not be much better.
.passive(...)? > I've updated the spec for the dict syntax. It actually simplifies > some other things. > > - Having .static as a separate method eliminates the need for '_match=False'. > - Putting the name in the first arg of .connect conforms to a > supported syntax in Routes 1. > - url_for can raise KeyError for an unknown named route, rather than > some custom exception. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
