On 12/13/07, Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As for infrequent releases, does it have serious bugs that necessitate > new releases? Ian wrote right on the home page, "Paste is an actively > maintained project. As of 1.0 (and actually before) we'll make a > strong effort to maintain backward compatibility.... There's really > no advantage to putting new development or major rewrites in Paste, as > opposed to putting them in new packages. Because of this it is planned > that major new development will happen outside of Paste. This makes > Paste a very stable and conservative piece of infrastructure for > building on. This is the intention." So Paste won't change much. If > there's anything about Paste we don't like, we can bypass it. Which > brings me back to my first question, what don't we like about Paste? > What should Paste be doing that it isn't? And can we get that another > way than Paste?
OK, I want to use a "paster request" method available through PasteScript (trunk). If I don't want to track svn trunk what are my options? Wait for a next release unknown period of time? Copy the request command impl. to my codebase (if licenses are compatible)? Submit a patch to Pylons that will provide this feature until official PasteScript release available? -- Max http://maxischenko.in.ua // http://www.linkedin.com/in/maksim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
