On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Mystilleef <[email protected]> wrote: > Calling gio.File's replace_contents or replace_contents_async on a file > at a remote location does not return. The file gets replaced but the > function does not return. I don't have this problem with local files. Is > this a bug? Can anyone else reproduce this problem? I'm I doing > something wrong?
could you post a code snippet that shows the problem? > Also in the C gio API reference manual, replace_contents_finish is > supposed to return a boolean value indicating success or failure. > However, the python binding returns a string. Is this intentional? yes it is intentional, in the C API the pass "char **new_etag" to the function where to store the returned string, in python we have to return the string from the method. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member [email protected] _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
