On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 5:19 AM Matt Callaghan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Chris - and I completely agree with your point. > > What is the community's preference to that consideration? > > The simplest solution I see is to add a "top header / block" that says the > summary of: > "It is Python3 going forward, officially as of Jan2020. This page is largely > out of date, but kept for historical reference as it provides value for > maintaining legacy Python2 systems." >
I can't speak for everyone, only myself. Personally, I think the page should basically say "use Python 3 unless you're maintaining legacy code", with some elaborating information; other people may have other preferred pitches. But if you want to keep it really simple, then something like you say will be of value, and will take a lot less effort. ChrisA _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
