minus OP On 06/10/2017 04:35 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > Thanks, Laura, we'll see about fixing that - and good luck with the IC > guide, which might be a suitable replacement. S > > Steve Holden
We've gotten these kinds of emails before, not sure we ought to agree to drive traffic their way (although to be honest it's probably nearly zero traffic). This all seems out of our hands anyway... there's a broken link on irchelp.org, which is pointed to by the PyPi entry for the irc package, which if it wants to reference the IRC RFC it should just do so directly (e.g. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459)... so it's not even the PyPi site content itself, but contributed package-specific content.... > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Laura Romano <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was on this page of your site recently - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ >> irc, when I noticed that one of the resources you mentioned isn't online. >> Here is the dead page - http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/rfc/, 'IRC >> specifications'. _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
