On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Aahz <a...@pythoncraft.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012, anatoly techtonik wrote: > > > > Is the current setup documented anywhere at all? > > If you point to the document, we can remove the burden of providing > > necessary instructions from you and stop talking about "overhead" in > > abstract terms by providing real diff of the changes. > > What "we"? AFAICT, you have not done any actual work to improve the > website, only putting forth a constant series of suggested changes for > other people to deal with. >
"we" are the people who want this /moin/ suffix removal, so there is more than just "me". I will do it alone, or somebody will help me - it doesn't matter. There will be somebody motivated enough to do the necessary change. As for everything else I feel like there is something personal towards me (it is a little bit offtopic, so it would be nice of you to continue with different subject if you want to continue). Is it denied to propose something to pydotorg-www? Are ideas at all welcome here? I don't feel like I am trustworthy enough to be given keys to all secret servers, and if I beg you - I doubt you will give them to me. Admit it. And neither site, nor the server config is open enough for me to propose any patches. I want Python website development to be open and inclusive for community. Increasing visibility and making maintenance process open _by default_ was my goal right from the start. If you remember I was the one who said that public list should a primary feedback mechanism unless there is a serious security issue. Right now I am facing resistance from people who don't want to do the change, because they personally don't need it even though other members of community would like to have it. I don't think it is the attitude that keeps these people maintaining python.org as a volunteers. Other, more realistic reason is the maintenance burden. And if we concentrate on this problem, we may realize, that this cause need more serious approach than you may thought. If people are so overwhelmed with maintenance burden of even existing infrastructure then how can we talk about centralized profiles, social features etc.? So practically no evolution is possible if changes are not welcomed, because all admins are paralyzed even if they don't mind against the change as a users. In this situation we need to solve support problem first, and start with configuration management tool and open repository like https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=operations/puppet.git;a=tree;f=files to avoid problems like this http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/msg2134 -- anatoly t.
_______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list pydotorg-www@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www