On 07.07.20 08:24, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > On July 7, 2020 6:42 am, Dietmar Maurer wrote: >>> so we have a 'termproxy' crate+binary and a binary package with name >>> 'pve-xtermjs' >> >> This is quite confusing ... > > well, it replaces a 'pve-xtermjs' binary package that ships a 'termproxy' > binary (/CLIHandler). the alternative is to bump the old pve-xtermjs to > become a transitional package depending on a new 'termproxy' > (pve-termproxy? proxmox-termproxy?) package that ships the termproxy > binary and breaks+replaces the old pve-xtermjs package..
the name is OK, IMO, it's just the same as before. The source package name is the only thing confusing to me, but I told Dominik already that we can do that like proxmox-backup, with our own control(.in) - but as we do not really use source package names yet, that confusion is now a bit secondary to me. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
