I totally agree, but wanted to point out that while this solution is not the prettiest, but the information is exactly where it needs to be.
The main reason for this is to identify backups residing on an old backup store like an archive. But I am open. Would you prefer having a manifest included in the archive or as a separate file on the same storage? Marco Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> [cid:inett5-126x70_81c2a0fa-28f3-411c-8d4f-6b70748d931f.png] Ihr IT Systemhaus in Saarbrücken [cid:Facebook_f91e3de6-689a-4957-b6ca-dbf3ca3c7f7b.png]<https://www.facebook.com/inettgmbh><https://plus.google.com/+InettDe>[cid:Twitter_ab6c04c5-c40f-43ea-a66b-5114ca78bf2d.png]<https://twitter.com/inettgmbh>[cid:RSS_170102a2-2aa4-4995-8b7c-d88dd57e8397.png]<https://www.inett.de/feed.rss> Marco Gabriel Geschäftsführer t: 0681-410993-0<tel:+496814109930> e: mgabr...@inett.de www.inett.de<http://www.inett.de> Technische Fragen: Support E-Mail: supp...@inett.de<mailto:supp...@inett.de> Support Hotline: 0681-410993-42<tel:+4968141099342> inett GmbH | Mainzer Str. 183 | 66121 Saarbrücken Geschäftsführung: Marco Gabriel | Amtsgericht Saarbrücken HRB 16588 ________________________________ From: Dietmar Maurer <diet...@proxmox.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 4:42:28 PM To: PVE development discussion <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Marco Gabriel - inett GmbH <mgabr...@inett.de> Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-guest-common 1/1] vzdump: added "includename" option > IMHO this is the wrong way to store additional information about > the backup. I am thinking about adding a manifest.json file which may contain such information .... _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
