----- Le 10 Oct 19, à 8:15, Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com a écrit : > also see: https://pve.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2012-August/003347.html
I saw this thread, as it's one of the only result when you try to search difference between scsi-hd, scsi-block and scsi-generic. So, it looks like the main motivations were : * Have unmap supported * Better performance Unmap is working with scsi-hd now, so it's not an advantage for scsi-generic anymore. There still is (at least theorical) performance advantages over scsi-hd. But IMHO, behing able to move disks live in every situations without risking a crash is more important. Maybe adding a config tuning like : scsi0: iscsi-zfs-prod:vm-114-disk-0,discard=on,size=45G,ssd=1,backend=<generic|block|hd> But with a default value of hd ? With this those for which the perf benefit have more value than the migration risks can still use it, but the default is safer for everyone. Cheers, Daniel -- [ https://www.firewall-services.com/ ] Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS, La sécurité des réseaux Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Tél : +33.5 56 64 15 32 Matrix: @dani:fws.fr [ https://www.firewall-services.com/ | https://www.firewall-services.com ] _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
