On 9/10/19 7:11 PM, Stefan Reiter wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.rei...@proxmox.com> > --- > www/manager6/form/CPUModelSelector.js | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/www/manager6/form/CPUModelSelector.js > b/www/manager6/form/CPUModelSelector.js > index dea6c44c..55532a0d 100644 > --- a/www/manager6/form/CPUModelSelector.js > +++ b/www/manager6/form/CPUModelSelector.js > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.form.CPUModelSelector', { > > valueField: 'value', > displayField: 'value', > + searchFields: [ 'value', 'vendor' ], > > emptyText: Proxmox.Utils.defaultText + ' (kvm64)', > allowBlank: true, >
instead of this and 2/3 we also could just a virtual combined field in the model and use that as displayField, like I did for the USB Selector [0]. But, just as idea, multi column search could be nice enough on it's own do justify the relative big overwrite in ComboGrid.. [0]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=19fa4ee333aaa193638858241651b0f9e1a40e2e _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel