On 8/9/19 2:02 PM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
it might be worth it to attempt to convince upstream to ship the "gluster" binary in its own package or move it to glusterfs-common (since it seems to be a general management CLI akin to Ceph's 'ceph', and not the actual server part).
On Fedora, for example, there already is a package called glusterfs-cli.
I am also not sure whether one of 'peer status' or 'pool list' is not better suited as scan command (the man page does not give much information ;)). there could be lots of volumes on a gluster cluster, and listing them all on each scan sounds expensive.
The output of our last working version of 'pvesm glusterfsscan <ip>' was a list of volumes which is exactly what 'gluster volume list' does.
I think this is reasonable as the volume names are required for a subsequent 'pvesm add glusterfs glustertest --server <ip> --volume <volname>'. cifsscan and nfsscan give the necessary information for a subsequent 'pvesm add' too.
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
