Hi,

On 11/09/2017 01:08 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> yes that's what i'm talking about. The logfile rotation script DOES a
> restart not a reload.
> 

No it doesn't do a systemd restart, it's a bit confusing - I know.

> See here:
> https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=blob_plain;f=debian/pve.logrotate;hb=HEAD
> 

It does a `pveproxy restart`, which _is_ a real graceful "fast" restart,
not to be confused with `systemctl restart pveproxy` which does a full
stop first, and then a full new startup again.

`systemctl reload pveproxy` does the exact same as the logrotation, see:

https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=blob_plain;f=bin/init.d/pveproxy.service

Thus the problem is not this but the one I described in the last paragraph
from my last answer:

On 11/09/2017 11:03 AM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> 
> We do a re-exec on "ourself" (from the daemons POV), and the intend is to
> leave non-idle child workers untouched, but the logic doing this is a bit
> flawed as all current worker child always receive a TERM signal.
> Here the HTTP server worker wait at least for active connection to end,
> but new ones do not get accepted. We directly restart after that, but yes,
> depending on load there can be a time window where no one is there to
> accept connections.
> I'd rather not send the TERM signal in the case where the
> "leave_children_open_on_reload" option is set and we're restarting but
> just restart, passing the current worker PIDs over to our new self
> (this gets already done). There on startup then start new workers and
> message the old ones to not  accept new connections and terminate
> gracefully as soon as possible. Now there is never a time where no active
> listening worker would there. I try to give it a look.
> 

cheers,
Thomas

_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to