On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:09:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Link wrote:
> ---
> src/PVE/JSONSchema.pm | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/JSONSchema.pm b/src/PVE/JSONSchema.pm
> index 3295599..92d60b9 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/JSONSchema.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/JSONSchema.pm
> @@ -163,6 +163,17 @@ sub pve_verify_vmid {
> return $vmid;
> }
>
> +register_format('pve-base-snapshot', \&pve_base_snaphot);
> +sub pve_base_snaphot {
> + my ($base_snapshot, $noerr) = @_;
> +
> + if ($base_snapshot !~ m/^[a-z0-9_\-]{2,40}$/i) {
> + return undef if $noerr;
> + die "value does not look like a valid base snapshot\n";
> + }
> + return $base_snapshot;
> +}
> +
I actually really meant a new option, not a new format ;) but either way
is fine I guess.
BUT, I'd really like this to be less vague, and only accept the regular
snapshot format, and the explicit PVE-internal naming schemes..
> register_format('pve-node', \&pve_verify_node_name);
> sub pve_verify_node_name {
> my ($node, $noerr) = @_;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
> https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
