I planned to try gfs2 on couple of my clusters. It will not work without corosync at all, because it's needed for DLM.
21.09.2016 2:25, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > Another question about my first idea (replace corosync), > > is is really difficult to replace corosync by something else ? > > Sheepdog storage for example, have support for corosync and zookeeper. > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "datanom.net" <m...@datanom.net> > À: "pve-devel" <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com> > Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Septembre 2016 01:08:48 > Objet: Re: [pve-devel] question/idea : managing big proxmox cluster > (100nodes), get rid of corosync ? > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:56:06 +0200 (CEST) > Alexandre DERUMIER <aderum...@odiso.com> wrote: > >>>> vmid are unique with a single cluster, but not within several clusters... >> yes, that's why I proposed to add some kind of optional prefix to vmid, >> could be defined in each cluster. >> > Instead of a literal prefix you could use a binary prefix instead. A > binary prefix occupies fewer bytes in pmxcfs meaning fewer bytes to > exchange between nodes and determine whether a VM is a citizen in this > cluster or form a foreign cluster is just a matter of a binary and (&). > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
